Home / Case Studies / Critical integration support
Case Study · Pharma & Healthcare · Run

Critical integrations always available, at lower cost

98.95%Resolution SLA over 10 months, always above the 92% target and never breached.
99.65%Availability of critical integrations.
10.5% lowerPlatform cost over two months, from R$111,009 to R$99,394 on a comparable basis.

Source: operation managed by Maxxi; cumulative indicators through July 2026.

Integrations supporting critical business processes ran on middleware with no resolution SLA, creating a risk of operational disruption. Maxxi took over 24x7 support with specialized on-call coverage and proactive monitoring. The operation went on to keep an unbroken SLA record, high availability and lower cost, with automation now detecting most incidents before users do.

The challenge

Critical integrations depended on a provider without a resolution SLA

Integrations connecting business systems ran on an integration platform with no commitment to a resolution timeframe. When something failed, there was no guarantee it would be restored within a defined period.

In a pharmaceutical operation, a stopped integration means a stopped process. This was not a matter of convenience; it was an operational continuity risk.

How Maxxi runs it

Reactive support became a proactive, governed operation

Maxxi took over 24×7 support with specialized on-call coverage and turned a reactive model into an operation designed to anticipate failures.

Proactive monitoring

Observability and triggers on the integration platform automatically open service requests before users notice an issue. In one recent month, automation opened 77 of 83 requests.

Triage and automation

Resolution time fell from 49 hours to 10.

Go-live coverage

Hour-by-hour monitoring, including weekends, resulted in zero reactive requests for two consecutive months.

Financial governance (FinOps)

An analysis of the billing model identified R$19,215 per month, 19.3% of the invoice, in idle capacity that could be removed.

Results

SLA consistently met, high availability and lower cost

How can a resolution SLA be secured for critical integrations?

Before

Critical integrations without a resolution SLA, incidents first noticed by users and a risk of disruption.

After

An unbroken SLA record, high availability and incidents detected by automation before users.

Business impact

The operation achieved a 98.95% SLA over 10 months, always above the 92% target and never breached; 99.65% availability; and a 10.5% reduction in platform cost over two months. It absorbed 51% more volume, from 55 to 83 requests per month, with no increase in team size.

Technical impact

Proactive monitoring began detecting most incidents before users; resolution time fell from 49 hours to 10; and financial governance identified idle capacity for removal.

For your strategy

Support is risk control, not a cost line

A critical integration without a resolution SLA is a silent risk: everything works until the day it does not. Effective support anticipates failure and proves the outcome; it does more than keep someone on call.

The model also draws on Managed Services & BPO.

Published 2026.

Do your critical integrations have a resolution SLA, or only an availability target?

Maxxi connects your business context to expertise in Engineering, Data and AI to weigh alternatives, anticipate risks and move forward with consistency.